Posts tagged ‘ISI and CIA and radical Islam’

November 18, 2011

Afghanistan: a nation where converts to Buddhism and Christianity face death

Afghanistan: a nation where converts to Buddhism and Christianity face death

Murad Makhmudov and Lee Jay Walker

Modern Tokyo Times

The United States, Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, and a host of other nations, keep on sending economic support to Afghanistan and how do the leaders of this nation respond?  Yes, they still support an ongoing Islamic inquisition whereby every Muslim convert to Buddhism, Hindusim or Christianity faces the death penalty.

In truth, the policies of Karzai and the Taliban are not so different because both sides support killing apostates from Islam, the prevention of non-Muslim places of worship, continuing discrimination against women and rigid stratification of Afghanistan. Therefore, any positive images of Kabul being shown in the media, is just “a hidden disguise of reality” and corruption is endemic alongside the heroin trade.

Afghan converts to Christianity and other faiths also face persecution outside of Afghanistan and if de-Islamization of culture isn’t installed into the younger generation via the education system, then what is the point?

Therefore, the mosque and Islamic Sharia law needs to be kept out of all major institutions and reformist Muslim organizations should be supported. After all, how can commerce, pluralism, religious freedom, female emancipation, the rights of homosexuals, and so forth, happen under the prevailing conditions of modern day Afghanistan?

Secularism, credit unions to help business initiatives, a growing liberal media network, a judiciary which is free from religious dogma and an educational system based on liberal values is needed. Of course, other important areas need changing and this applies to restrictions on dress and challenging the power base of traditional rulers who care little about modernity.

This Sunni Islamic version of Islam in Afghanistan is mainly ultra-conservative and based on preserving inequality and the subjugation of non-Muslims, women, and maintaining stratification. The Islamic enlightenment in this country is a million miles away. Therefore, the current Western policy appears to be based on the status quo and allowing another generation of girls to be chained by an oppressive society.

If the option is the Taliban who recently stoned a woman to death for so-called immorality, yes, Mohammed married a child of 6 years of age and consummated the marriage with Aisha when she was 9 years old, and by this time Mohammed was over 50 (Obviously morality is conditional on individuals and not their own prophet); or the Karzai government which is corrupt and supports killing apostates via the state; then what option is this?

Trillions of dollars have been spent on Afghanistan and the return on all this money is you have schools which teach basic education to girls. However, this educational system is uneven and in more conservative areas it is still disliked.

Therefore, what are NATO forces and American troops dying for? Why are the sons and daughters of democrats being thrown to “the jaws of radical Sunni Islam” and the complete corruption and hypocrisy of the Karzai regime?

Once Buddhism and Hinduism nurtured the land of Afghanistan but the Islamic inquisition after countless invasions changed everything and one day all Buddhists would disappear because of many factors. These factors apply to dhimmitude, massacres, pogroms, and once the power shift became dominated by Islamic forces then Buddhism was doomed to just being a shell.

However, the Taliban didn’t even like a shell, therefore, the forces of conservative Sunni Islam turned against all Buddhist images. At the same time, the forces of radical Sunni Islam then turned against the Shia and slaughtered them in the thousands but of course Osama Bin Laden believed that this policy was both Islamic and a jihad.

This madness, and it is madness, which desires to kill apostates to Buddhism, apostates to Christianity, kill homosexuals, stone women to death for adultery, and so forth; isn’t being challenged by “the light of democracy;” on the contrary it is being challenged by appeasement and the corruption of the Karzai regime which also supports killing all apostates and not allowing any other religion in Afghanistan.

If Western political leaders just desire the status quo then surely they should stop wasting the lives of military people who are dying for nothing. Also, tax-payers money shouldn’t be thrown at a county which is undemocratic and corrupt.

America likes to rebuke North Korea but women at least have a million times more freedom in this nation than Afghan women. The same also applies to Saudi Arabia where women can’t drive cars and shop freely with men and so forth.

Indeed, you have more Christian churches in North Korea than in both Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. What does this tell us about Western policy and the nature of conservative Sunni Islam? Also, Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia are deemed to be allies but from the point of view of democracy, religious freedom, equality of the sexes, and so forth, it certainly doesn’t look like it.

It is time to stop coddling up to despotism and for greater accountability.

http://www.aina.org/news/20111116185325.htm  (Recent article about apostates in Afghanistan)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2060380/Afghan-mother-daughter-stoned-shot-dead-Taliban-accused-moral-deviation-adultery.html  (Woman and daughter stoned to death)

leejay@moderntokyotimes.com

http://moderntokyotimes.com

 
 
 
Advertisements
November 11, 2011

Afghanistan to Bosnia: Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Bill Clinton and Sept 11

Afghanistan to Bosnia: Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Bill Clinton and Sept 11

Murad Makhmudov and Lee Jay Walker

Modern Tokyo Times

The conflicts in Bosnia and Kosovo would have done Harry Houdini proud. After all, around 8,000 Islamic terrorists travelled all the way to Bosnia and some would either stay or move to Kosovo or go back home. These Islamic jihadists were given “a free-reign to commit terror” and to kill Orthodox Christians in the Balkans and all in the name of civilization.

Not only this, true to Harry Houdini these Islamic jihadists who had stoned women to death in Afghanistan, killed Shia minorities, assisted terrorism in many parts of the world, killed homosexuals, and other bestial crimes – were now not only fighting on the side of Bill Clinton and his “Islamic terrorist brigade,” but all 8,000 terrorists bypassed countless security checks in many nations and travelled freely and unhindered.

Of course this miracle was never that because instead intelligence agencies from various nations colluded with Islamic jihadists in order to break international law. Obviously, if any nation allowed 8,000 of the most hardened Islamic terrorists in the world into America and then armed them militarily; I am sure that the American people would desire revenge on the nation or nations which did this and clearly they would defend themselves.

If the American people look closely enough then Jimmy Carter, the ex-National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, Ronald Reagan administration, Bill Clinton, and a host of others, should have been charged (Ronald Reagan passed away already) with assisting Islamic terrorism and enabling September 11 to happen. However, amazingly, no criminal case exists against any of these individuals despite their duplicity in supporting international Sunni Islamic terrorism.

Also, some radical Sunni Islamists who were given “covert freedom” to slit the throats of Orthodox Christians in Bosnia within the “shadows of Bill Clinton,” would later show their kindness by being involved in September 11. Alas, the media never said much about this fact and Bill Clinton must count his lucky stars that the American people are either very forgiving or they simply don’t know?

The role of many media outlets was utter shame because where were the reports during the war that thousands of Islamic terrorists were given clearance checks and false passports in Bosnia? Not only this, some of the most evil people on the planet then found an abundance of military weapons in modern day Europe in order that they could kill innocent Orthodox Christians.

The propaganda spin and anti-Serbian policies still continue in 2011 and only when Serbia completely bows down and forsakes their “Orthodox Christian Jerusalem in Kosovo” will they be accepted.  It matters not that the Kosovo Liberation Army was a terrorist organization and it matters not that hundreds of churches have been destroyed and the elites have been involved in organ scandals, killings, the drug trade, and so forth because Kosovo became another Bosnia.

Simply put, you couldn’t dream of an open American and British policy in Afghanistan and Bosnia of supporting individuals who want to turn the “world into year zero.” However, when you think about thousands of American soldiers who died for democracy (and are still dying) in Afghanistan and Iraq, only to be betrayed by their own government, which then turned over once secular nations to Islamic Sharia states, then maybe out of this madness you have too much consistency?

After all, the Christians of Iraq and Orthodox Christians of Kosovo share one common theme.  Simply put, when America went in you had massive de-Christianization in both Kosovo and Iraq and today both communities are surviving on the margins in “Christian ghettoes.” 

The ratlines of American, British and Saudi Arabian collusion goes back decades. Therefore, while France supported pan-Arabism, socialism, and secular forces in the Levant and North Africa; the nations of America, the United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia supported conservative and tyrannical Islamic forces in the Sunni Muslim world.

In an article called USA, CIA Created Sunni Islamic Terrorism by a writer connected with Modern Tokyo Times it was stated that “To place an exact date is complex because links between America and radical Sunni Islamic forces run deep but it is clear that democratic forces, nationalistic movements, pan-Arabism, socialism, and other more moderate forces were seen to be the enemy. For example, Egypt went from being secular under Nasser to adopting Islamic laws under the pro-American, Anwar Sadat.”

“The same scenario would happen in Pakistan because America welcomed General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq who took power in the late 1970s. Therefore, Pakistan was transformed into a more Islamized nation whereby laws and other institutions would be Islamized. In time the USA would strengthen their ties with Zia-ul-Haq in order to fund the Islamic insurgency in Afghanistan.”

“The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) implemented Operation Cyclone and this policy was aimed at supporting the Afghan Mujahideen during the Soviet war in Afghanistan. Jimmy Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski began a new policy whereby America would support radical Islam in the full knowledge that this meant supporting terrorism and a movement which supported killing all apostates from Islam and persecuting women.”

“Just like Jimmy Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski, the next leader of America, Ronald Reagan, would continue this policy. Jimmy Carter stated that “The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan is the greatest threat to peace since the Second World War.” However, the greatest threat to global peace was America and the Sunni Islamic terrorist movement which was funded by the CIA and other important American operatives.”

“However, unlike communism or pan-Arabism, or other political ideologies, these movements are temporary. Yet radical Islam had sprouted up throughout history after periods of relative decline and it is not a movement which can be switched on and off. After all, we are talking about a radical ideology which is fused with religion and this makes it more potent.”

“Therefore, both political parties in America were involved in the funding of radical Sunni Islam. This applies to people like Michael G. Vickers, a Special Forces NCO, who was commissioned by the CIA to support radical Islamic forces. Of major importance was coordination and launching attacks against the Soviet Union which would prove to be successful. Given this, Vickers, and other covert operatives, would train terrorists and in time they would unleash a force that could not be contained.”

“The CIA’s regional head, Gustav Avrakotos, alongside people like Charlie Wilson, Gordan Humphrey, Fred Ikle, William Casey, Joanne Herring, and a host of others, were all responsible in spreading radical Islam in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Therefore, the “dark forces” of radical Sunni Islam were being unified via enormous funding and military training. Therefore the CIA, political leaders, and the people mentioned above, would all play their role in the future destabilization of Afghanistan and Pakistan and in making September 11th happen.”

“Of instrumental importance was the nation of Pakistan and the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) unit which would work hand-in-hand with the CIA and other covert networks. Other nations were also involved, including the British, because MI6 and the SAS, would help to train Islamic terrorists and of course Saudi Arabia would provide ample funds in order to spread radical Sunni Islam.”

“Between 1981 and 1987, the USA provided over US$3.2 billion dollars and this was followed by a further $4.2 billion dollars. More important, the CIA, MI6, the SAS, and other covert agencies, were involved in training radical Islamists. The outcome being a multi-ethnic jihadist movement which would be armed and trained by America, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, and others, but with America and Saudi Arabia being the cornerstone, and with Pakistan being the unifying factor because of geopolitical factors.”

“Therefore, major Sunni Islamic warlords like Gulbuddin Hekmatyar would be funded and trained. Hekmatyar in turn would develop relations with Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda and the nucleus of this would come by helping Maktab al-Khadamat.”

Obviously, the forces unleashed by Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Ronald Reagan and subordinates who followed the same line under different governments, for example Michael G. Vickers, Gustav Avrakotos, Charlie Wilson, Gordan Humphrey, Fred Ikle, William Casey, Joanne Herring, and a host of others, have “the blood of innocents” all over them.  More alarming from an American point of view, is that radical Sunni Islamic terrorism was trained, supported, and united under different covert agencies. This ultimately led to September 11 because of the collective policies of all the above mentioned, and many more, and the same applies to Bill Clinton’s Islamist policies in Bosnia.

It seems amazing that individuals who have supported Sunni Islamic terrorism which was responsible for killing Shia Muslims in Afghanistan, stoning women to death, killing apostates, beheading Orthodox Christians in Bosnia, killing people for organs in Kosovo, and enforcing a nightmare on the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan, and in many other places; should be allowed to escape criminal courts.

Also, the brave American soldiers who have died and continue to be killed in Afghanistan are only dying because of past American governments who supported the same forces that America is fighting today.  Indeed, the conflict in Afghanistan is about fighting an ideology that Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Ronald Reagan administration helped to create and unite into a potent multinational Sunni Islamist movement.

Therefore, why aren’t the parents of American soldiers complaining about these past leaders who ultimately helped to create September 11 and assisted so many terrorist actions all over the world?  After all, it is their sons and daughters who are being killed in Afghanistan and if it wasn’t for past American policies “the fallen” would be alive.

If America, the United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and other nations, had kept out of Afghanistan and weren’t involved in supporting conservative Islam, then “a new light” might have emerged. Instead, women walk in shadows in Afghanistan and parts of Pakistan and religious minorities reside in fear. Also, the opium dimension was allowed to flourish in order to muster economic funding and these short-sighted policies continue to blight many nations.

The Cold War excuse by individuals like Zbigniew Brzezinski is pathetic and Afghanistan had nothing to do with the demise of the Soviet Union.  Only a fool would come to such a conclusion because clearly the internal economic mechanisms and democratic forces in Europe could no longer be contained in an increasingly digital world.

America never collapsed because of pulling American troops out of Vietnam and other nations because the economic system and other mechanisms at home still work. Therefore, the only thing that Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Ronald Reagan administration did was to destroy any hope of pluralism in Afghanistan and to unleash terrorist psychopaths and a dangerous ideology which continues to kill and imprison people.

Also, the Cold War was well and truly over during the conflicts in the Balkans but Bill Clinton followed the same route of supporting “an Islamic terrorist network.” Indeed, the one thing that unites the ilk of Zbigniew Brzezinski, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton is their covert support of Islamic terrorism and “having the blood of innocents” on their hands and this applies to the deaths of people on September 11.

John R. Schindler who is the author of Unholy Terror, comments that “Although Sarajevo’s supporters went to great lengths to deny it, there was no avoiding the reality that after 9/11, as al-Qa’ida attacks multiplied across the world, a disturbing number of the terrorists involved had close ties to Bosnia and the holy war waged there. The dedicated cadres bin Laden had first nurtured in Afghanistan and brought to fruition in Bosnia were ready for the all-out confrontation with the “apostates” and “infidels” that al-Qa’ida had promised.”  (Page 296 – Unholy Terror)

John R. Schindler also states that “The role of the West in the fate of Bosnia cannot be underestimated. The willful blindness of Western elites, the dishonest and mendacious representations of Bosnia and its war presented by intellectuals, academics, entertainers and journalists, decisively influenced the course of the conflict, to the benefit of radical Islam.”  (Page 324 – Unholy Terror)

Shaul Shay in his book Islamic Terror and the Balkans comments about the connection between the Madrid bombing, Al Qaida camps in Bosnia and the Sarajevo connection and clearly these ratlines were aided by the Bill Clinton Administration either covertly or by turning a blind eye – either way, part of the responsibility belongs to the Bill Clinton administration. Therefore, in Madrid the former leader of America should be held accountable alongside leaders in the Bosnian Muslim leadership for allowing this.

Shaul Shay comments that “Dragomir Adnan, the commander of the police in Sofia, Bulgaria stated during a press conference that the terrorists who had perpetrated the attacks on Madrid trains had been trained in Al Qaida camps in Bosnia-Herzegovina and that eleven of the suspects had reached Spain via Sarajevo. He also claimed that the explosives used for the preparation of the bombs had been manufactured in Bosnia.” (Page 167 – Islamic Terror and the Balkans)

Also, American soldiers in Iraq would come under attack from the forces that Bill Clinton supported in the Balkans. Therefore, just like the killing of American soldiers in 2011 in Frankfurt by a Muslim from Kosovo, it was the forces which America supported that turned against America.  This clearly means that the appeasement and usage of Islamists is always a hand that will bite the “power” that once fed it. However, nothing is ever learnt and now we have Islamists gaining power in North Africa and Coptic Christians are being killed in Egypt but of course the new powerbrokers in Egypt were welcomed based on wishful thinking.

Before September 11 happened in 2001 the Republican Policy Committee stated on January 16, 1997, in a House Subcommittee that “The Administration’s Iranian green light policy gave Iran an unprecedented foothold in Europe and has recklessly endangered American lives and US strategic interests.”

The report link is http://rpc.senate.gov/releases/1997/iran.htm and clearly in the heart of the American government many individuals understood that the policy of Bill Clinton was dangerous. Therefore, given the connection with individuals who did September 11, Madrid, and other terrorist attacks, which emanated out of Muslim controlled areas in Bosnia, then surely Bill Clinton and others in his government should be put on trial for endangering civilians in America and throughout the world.

The House Subcommittee states that “….the Clinton green light would lead to this degree of Iranian influence, it is necessary to remember that the policy was adopted in the context of extensive and growing radical Islamic activity in Bosnia. That is, the Iranians and other Muslim militants had long been active in Bosnia; the American green light was an important political signal to both Sarajevo and the militants that the United States was unable or unwilling to present an obstacle to those activities — and, to a certain extent, was willing to cooperate with them. In short, the Clinton Administration’s policy of facilitating the delivery of arms to the Bosnian Muslims made it the de facto partner of an ongoing international network of governments and organizations pursuing their own agenda in Bosnia: the promotion of Islamic revolution in Europe. That network involves not only Iran but Brunei, Malaysia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan (a key ally of Iran), and Turkey, together with front groups supposedly pursuing humanitarian and cultural activities.”

In the book called The Revenge of the Prophet by the acclaimed Vojin Joksimovich, he comments that “Osama Bin Laden saw a great opportunity in Bosnia and established a base of operations in Europe against Al Qaeda’s true enemy, the U.S. The Afghan Jihad and the Gulf War combined to produce fertile ground for 9/11.  However, Bosnia became the direct springboard for 9/11, the Madrid train bombings and probably London.”  Page 298 – The Revenge of the Prophet

The recent attack in Sarajevo in 2011 just like other jihadists in the Balkans was given fresh momentum by allowing so many outside Islamists into the region. Not only this, Saudi Arabian funded projects and other nations are intent on spreading their version of Islam and now you have one massive network. Before the war broke out you had internal Islamists in Bosnia but the civil war and covert policies by Bill Clinton enabled finance, training, Islamic missionary work, terrorist cells, and other dark forces, to grow and spread throughout the region.

Ironically, moderate Muslim elements in Bosnia and the government have much to fear from radical Islam and Islamic terrorist cells. Also, moderate Muslim religious leaders understand that an “inner-war” is going on for the hearts and minds and the greatest threat to not only Orthodox Christians and Catholics in Bosnia, but also to moderate Muslim elements, is a growing conservative Islamic movement.

Sooner or later “an internal clash” will develop and younger Muslims will either be indoctrinated, turn away from Islam or deep divisions will emerge between different Muslim sects. After all, modernity, Europe, pluralism, an Islamic Sharia state, and jihadist movements, is going to create internal convulsions and the Sarajevo Muslim controlled government only fears Islamic terrorism.

Collectively, forces unleashed by Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, and so many others, enabled September 11 to happen and the same applies to many other Sunni Islamic terrorist attacks. Also, the same Sunni Islamic terrorist movements which once were supported by individuals like Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, and others, have their hands “dripping full of blood.”

This applies to the massacres of Shia Muslims by Sunni Islamic zealots in Afghanistan; the slaughter of Orthodox Christians by Sunni Islamic terrorists in Bosnia; the slaughter of Americans on September 11; the Madrid attack; stoning to death of women in Afghanistan; the degradation of women in Afghanistan and parts of Pakistan; attacks against minorities in Pakistan; and a host of other issues including the heroin and drug trade. Therefore, each leader is responsible for the events that occurred during their time in power.

Today moderate Muslim forces in Pakistan are under attack; Orthodox Christians reside in ghettoes in Kosovo; the Christian community in Iraq is in free-fall; Afghanistan is a hell-whole for women, democrats, moderate Muslims and apostates from Islam; American troops have been killed and will continue to be killed by former Islamic allies who were supported by American government elites; Pakistan is in crisis; the heroin trade continues to spread misery internationally; in Kosovo you also have a barbaric organ scandal and ongoing de-Orthodox Christianization; Saudi Arabia an ally of America continues to spread its indoctrination internationally; and other dark forces.

In all the above you have the hand of past American policies and the deaths of so many innocents. Isn’t it time for past American leaders to be put on trial because September 11 can be traced back to American policies under several governments.

If political leaders are not held accountable then the same bloody policies will continue and if America desires justice and sending Serbs to The Hague, then how about internal justice in America? Also, de-Christianization in Kosovo and Iraq is based on policies that were made in Washington and the dark forces of radical Sunni Islamic terrorist networks were supported by past American governments.

The deaths of American troops in Afghanistan in 2011 and the barbaric terrorist attack on September 11 are based on the policies of Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and others. After all, they helped to create “a Sunni Islamic terrorists killing machine” and gave these dark forces the chance to grow and spread from Afghanistan to Bosnia.

Each individual leader is responsible for different areas but collectively they are in the chain.  The deaths of innocent Orthodox Christians in Bosnia to women being in the shadows in Afghanistan, is one long continuous chain and the same applies to brave American soldiers dying because of past American policies.

September 11 will always remain empty until a thorough investigation of individuals like Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, people involved in the Ronald Reagan administration, and Bill Clinton takes place. They also should be held accountable for what they did to Afghanistan/Pakistan (Zbigniew Brzezinski) and the Balkans (Bill Clinton).

http://rpc.senate.gov/releases/1999/fr033199.htm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrBuBAaXpSM Zbigniew Brzezinski

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lSRFC-jVPw  (Islamists in Bosnia because of USA, Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Islamist Alija Izetbegovic)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03DQJ7skClg&feature=related  (Islamists in Bosnia because of USA, Saudi Arabia, Iran and the Islamist Alija Izetbegovic)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cyl5wxJPIQs  (Muslim massacres of Christians)

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/rival-muslims-battle-on-in-bihac-1422695.html   (Inter Muslim fighting – Serbs supported moderate Muslims)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Onbxpq3qI0c   (Henry Kissinger)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1w4p1J9fyg&NR=1  (Henry Kissinger)

KOSOVO AND ORGAN SCANDAL – All sources are American and from the United Kingdom

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/16/world/europe/16kosovo.html

http://articles.cnn.com/2010-12-16/world/kosovo.organs_1_report-links-kosovo-liberation-army-report-charges?_s=PM:WORLD

PAST ARTICLES BY MODERN TOKYO TIMES

http://moderntokyotimes.com/2011/09/01/orthodox-christian-ghettoization-and-anti-serb-clampdown-in-kosovo/

http://moderntokyotimes.com/2011/09/30/nasdaq-brings-shame-on-itself-by-inviting-hashim-thaci-killing-for-organ-scandal/

http://moderntokyotimes.com

 
October 25, 2010

USA: failed quadrangle of Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia

USA: failed quadrangle of Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia

Lee Jay Walker

The Modern Tokyo Times

 

Obama bows to the King of Saudi Arabia in the full knowledge that this nation is exporting militant Islam and that all apostates from Islam face the death penalty 
Obama bows to the King of Saudi Arabia in the full knowledge that this nation is exporting militant Islam and that all apostates from Islam face the death penalty
——————————————————————————————————————

 

President Obama likes to talk about human dignity and human rights but clearly he, just like other leaders of America, irrespective if Democrat or Republican, can’t bypass the lure of major military contracts irrespective of the reality of modern day Saudi Arabia.  It also appears that lessons learnt from Pakistan have been zero.  Therefore, today you have two nations which are responsible for so much of global terrorism but ironically both these nations have been military armed and supported politically by America.

It is also abundantly clear that Pakistan is an unstable nuclear power and this nation state is threatened by its own internal policies towards radical Sunni Islamic organizations and the threat posed by Islamists to the nation state.  Just like Pakistan, the nation state of Saudi Arabia is also unstable in the long-term because the ruling monarchy rules via an “iron-fist” and clearly this nation is the most draconian in the modern world.

If Islamists overthrew the power mechanisms of both governments in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia then a strong and potent military will be bequeathed to radical Sunni Islamists and regional nations, for example India and Israel, will be threatened. 

In both wars in Afghanistan and Iraq it is clear that Sunni Islamic organizations and terrorist organizations were (and continue to be) behind much of the mayhem that engulfed both nations after the tragic events of September 11th.  Given this, it is abundantly clear that American troops and military forces from other nations who supported America, have been killed because of the policies of so-called allies and this applies to either tacit support, covert support, or by doing little to prevent Sunni Islamists from spreading their hatred in both Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

Vojin Joksimovich the author of The Revenge of the Prophet, states that The long-term strategy is proselytism of Islam and Wahhabi Islam in particular.  French scholar Giles Kepel used the term ‘petrodollar Islam’ for a vast infusion of proselytizing wealth from Saudi Arabia.  Proselytism and the checkbook diplomacy long have been the Saudis’ principal foreign policy tools.  The Saudis have built thousands of mosques worldwide.  While the Islamist terrorism is being challenged the petrodollar Islam quest is yet to receive due attention.”   (Page 11 – Revenge of the Prophet by Vojin Joksimovich)

Vojin Joksimovich continues by stating “At the core is the U.S.-Saudi bond starting with the 1945 Quincy Deal signed by President Roosevelt…….Part of the deal was American non-interference in Saudi domestic policies…..At the same time Saudi Arabia is the fortress of strict Wahhabism, its state religion, which represents the most radical branch of Sunni Islam determined to proselytize its version of Islam to the West.  The House of Saud underwrote the religious schools that turn out jihadists, just as it administered charities that funded the jihadists.  Addiction to cheap oil and Saudi petrodollars caused the U.S. to turn a blind eye to Saudi support of the fundamentalist groups linked to terrorism.  A New Statesman report summarized: ‘Bin Laden and his gang are just the tentacles; the head lies safely in Saudi Arabia, protected by U.S. forces.’”

“There is substantive evidence of complicity on the part of prominent Saudi and Pakistani citizens in 9/11.  Nonetheless, the 9/11 Commission and the White House gave the Saudi and Pakistanis a free pass because Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are treated as historic U.S. allies.”  (Page 12 – The Revenge of the Prophet by Vojin Joksimovich) 

Turning back to the proposed military deal with Saudi Arabia and continuing support for Pakistan via enormous economic support, it is clear that while America may take note of Israel, the same does not apply to India to any great extent.  After all, from terrorist attacks in Kashmir to the tragic terrorist attack in Mumbai, it is clear that all roads lead back to Pakistan and supporting terrorism directly or covertly or via non-compliance of preventing terrorism, is a reality.

B. Raman (Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi) commented after the leader of India visited Saudi Arabia (Feb 27-Mar 1, 2010) that Like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia has been following a dual policy on terrorism. It has taken ruthless action against Al Qaeda elements posing a threat to its internal security. At the same time, it has avoided taking action against Wahhabi organizations which have been supporting terrorism in other countries. Many of the so-called charity organizations, which have been funding terrorist organizations in other countries including India and Bangladesh, are of Saudi origin. Despite international pressure on Saudi Arabia to act against such charity organizations and stop the flow of funds to global jihadi terrorism, the action taken by the Saudi authorities has been unsatisfactory.Quotes from Outlook India at http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264502 

It would be futile to expect that Saudi Arabia could be of assistance to India in dealing with jihadi terrorism emanating from Pakistan or Bangladesh. There has been a long history of links between jihadi terrorist elements in India and Saudi Arabia ever since the demolition of the Babri Masjid in December, 1992.”   

Despite this reality, and the fact that Saudi Arabia is spreading radical Sunni Islam to countless numbers of nations it is more than apparent that America, and a host of other democratic nations, are either turning a blind eye or giving tacit approval or intelligence services are sleepwalking into a future nightmare or indeed a combination of all three.

After all, what are democratic nations getting in return in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia?  It appears that the answer is negative because despite vast resources being spent on Afghanistan it is clear that this nation supports killing converts to Christianity from Islam, keeping women in chains, and to maintain the power mechanisms of Islamic Sharia law.

The Taliban and Al-Qaeda are also destabilizing Afghanistan because of the reality of Pakistan and the dangerous game being played by elements within the Pakistan ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence).  For democratic India this is a nightmare and a continuing nightmare because Kashmir and terrorist attacks like Mumbai are clear reminders that “terrorism is a tool within the body politic of Pakistan.”

In Saudi Arabia it is much the same and many Sunni Islamic terrorist attacks in Iraq were because of the involvement of Saudi nationals. This applies to direct terrorist attacks, economic funding, supporting radical Sunni Islamic organizations, spreading propaganda, and weakening the role of the central government in Iraq by playing the Sunn-Shia sectarian card.

At the same time not one single non-Muslim place of worship is allowed in Saudi Arabia and women are trampled on and this applies to preventing women from speaking openly, going shopping in mixed shopping malls, driving cars, and dressing how they desire.  

More alarming for the international community is that Saudi Arabian organizations and charities are spreading a dangerous Wahhabi ideology to many nations, irrespective if to mainly Muslim nations or non-Muslim nations.  Stealth jihad within democratic nations is also a serious issue and it is clear that Saudi Arabia is exporting a two-fold version of Islam and this applies to militant Islam and liberal Islam in order to cause confusion and mayhem, via deceit and ulterior long-term motives.

Therefore, economic support which is being given by Western nations in Afghanistan is merely adding fuel to the fire because it is supporting the implementation of Islamic Sharia law and discrimination against women and non-Muslims.  At the same time by supporting Pakistan and Saudi Arabia the end game from an Islamist point of view is that both nations can spread Islam to distant lands and destabilize other nations by using terrorism.

This means that India is facing the brunt of this failed policy towards Pakistan and radical Sunni Islam is growing within parts of India and of course the terrorist threat is never far away.  In Iraq the same happened because much of the Sunni Islamic instability is based on the Saudi Arabian angle and this applies to terrorism, spreading hatred towards the Shia, and maintaining instability in order that democracy does not threaten the power base of regional despots.

For the Christian community in Iraq which is under siege it is clear that they were mere fodder.  After all, the Christian community was left to face the brunt of radical Islam, and just like the Hindus of Kashmir, they have been abandoned and forsaken in order to appease Islamists and Islamization.  How ironic that Iraq was secular, just like Afghanistan under Najibullah, however, both Iraq and Afghanistan would implement Islamic Sharia law after America became entangled and created a “hornets nest.”

Therefore, the three conservative Islamic nations of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, are allowed to trample non-Muslim minorities and to maintain that women stay in the shadows.  At the same time, militant Islamic organizations are spreading to other parts of the world because of the role of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, and the money and educational supply route is creating mayhem within majority Muslim nations and within the non-Muslim democratic world.

Western governments appear to be at a loss because continuing Islamic immigration, radical Islamic organizations, and the radical Islamic convert conveyor belt keeps on churning out jihad at home and enabling Islamists to spread their hatred far and wide.  Meanwhile liberal Muslims jump on the bandwagon and condemn any minor slight against Islam in order to install fear and stealth jihad.  Also, Muslim rights appear to be higher for national governments rather than the rights of the majority because appeasement mode is holding sway.

Vojin Joksimovich states that “The most pressing underlying root cause is the Saudi Wahhabi-led petrodollar hegemony over the Islamic world, typically but not exclusively exercised through organizations like the Muslim World League, Organization of Islamic Conference, various Islamic so-called humanitarian organizations, etc.”

Vojin Joksimovich continues by stating that “It is imperative to starve these terrorist organizations of financial resources and recruits.  The present generation of Western leaders has been unwilling to take bold steps for two primary reasons: The oil addiction in what could be termed Petrolistan as well as the petrodollars ploughed back into the Western economies and various individual and corporate coffers.” Page 305 – The Revenge of the Prophet by Vojin Joksimovich)

It is clear that when communism collapsed in Eastern Europe that Western powers supported democracy and they did not desire to pro-up communism.  However, when it comes to the Islamic world it is apparent that Western powers either pro-up or re-install Islam, Islamic Sharia law, and state control by this indoctrination.

After all, Christians did not fear the role of Islamic Sharia law in the pre-attacked Iraq and irrespective of what people think about Najibullah in Afghanistan it is clear that he at least tried to break the chain.  However, both times America re-enforced the Islamic Sharia law chain by overthrowing the leader of Iraq and by supporting Islamists in Afghanistan.

Could it just be that India is expendable in order to appease Pakistan?  Could it just be that Christians in Iraq were expendable in order to appease the house of Islam?  If so, then are Western societies also expendable with regards to allowing radical Islam to grow and by continuing to allow Muslim immigration which is altering the make-up of many nations in Europe?

Also, why are American troops and allied forces being killed with the tacit approval of so-called allies in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia?  It appears somewhat strange to fight wars in Afghanistan and Iraq while supporting Pakistan and Saudi Arabia on the military and economic front. 

B. Raman in response to recent support by America towards Pakistan stated that “The Pakistan army uses the Punjabi Taliban against India in an attempt to force a change in the status quo in Jammu and Kashmir.  It has been using Al Qaeda, the Pashtun Taliban and their global jihadi allies for extracting money out of the US by dangling the threat of another 9/11 over the US head if it does not pay protection money to the Pakistan army.”

“Despite the blunt words reportedly used by Obama, Mrs. Clinton and Gates in more restricted interactions, more protection money was forthcoming in the form of a five-year commitment (2021-2016) of US $2.29 billion in military aid euphemistically called counter-terrorism assistance.  This will be in continuation of the allocation of US $1.5 billion provided by the George Bush Administration in 2005 and of the civilian aid of US $7.5 billion over five-year period already being provided by the Obama Administration since last year under the Kerry Lugar Act.”  (http://ramanstrategicanalysis.blogspot.com)  (October 24, 2010)

This, and the proposed mega military deal by the Obama Administration with Saudi Arabia, merely shows you that the “war on terror” is being fought by propping up allies who are increasing the “war on terror” and exporting Islamic radicalism and terrorism to nations like India, the United Kingdom, and a host of other nation states. 

Therefore, despite knowing that Islamists are spreading their hatred from both so-called allies and in the full knowledge that Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are exporting radical Islam; it appears that for Obama, and other Western leaders, that the same record must be played.  The hidden danger of this policy and untold carnage which is continuing because of these “two ace of spades (Pakistan and Saudi Arabia)” is alarming many but it appears that it isn’t alarming the people in power in Washington, London, and other nations, who support this policy of “no reward and Islamic appeasement.”

Collectively this means more terrorism and the spread of Islamic militancy and instead of containing Islam it is spreading its power and thought patterns to the democratic world. The situation in blunt terms means that all other faiths are being crushed or persecuted by the allies of America in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia.  However, in the backyard of America and the democratic world we are witnessing the rise of Islam and stealth jihad.  Therefore, it appears that America, India, the United Kingdom, and the free world, must brace itself for either confrontation or to be taken over brick by brick and end up like the graveyard of Buddhists and Hindus in Afghanistan and Pakistan respectively.

Lee Jay Walker

BOOK 

 VOJIN JOKSIMOVICH – The Revenge of the Prophet

http://islamicinquisition.wordpress.com

http://leejaywalker.wordpress.com